Ethereum: Summer.fi attacked, approximately $6 million worth of DAI stolen.
U.Today
07-06 16:45
Ai Focus
Summer.fi's vault was manipulated by a flash loan, resulting in the theft of approximately $6 million in DAI. The team has suspended the relevant contracts.
Helpful
No.Help

An automated vault operated by the Ethereum multi-chain protocol Summer.fi was attacked on Monday, resulting in the theft of approximately $6 million in DAI. On-chain security companies Blockaid, PeckShield, and CertiK subsequently disclosed the anomaly, stating that their teams have suspended the affected contracts but have not yet announced compensation arrangements.

Price within the Flash Loan Twisted Pool

The core of this attack was to distort the liquidity of the vault pool by using large flash loans. The attackers used approximately $65.4 million in flash loans to target a vault pool named LazyVault_LowerRisk_USDC.

The product was originally positioned as a low-risk strategy vault, with risk management handled by Block Analitica. During the attack, an algorithm malfunctioned within the pool, causing the displayed annualized yield to briefly surge to approximately 2.08 million. The attackers then exploited this price distortion to quickly withdraw user funds.

The main losses were concentrated in LVUSDC

PeckShield stated that the primary affected entity is Summer.fi's LVUSDC vault. On-chain data shows that one of the largest related addresses appears to be linked to Torben Jorgensen, co-founder of the Web3 company UDHC.

  • The flash loan amounted to approximately $65.4 million.
  • Approximately $6 million in assets were transferred out of DAI.
  • The abnormal annualized rate once rose to approximately 2.08 million%.

The report mentioned that the address deposited approximately 8.6 million USDC into the relevant pool shortly before the attack, subsequently becoming one of the biggest losers in the incident. The transferred DAI was quickly redeemed through the Uniswap V3 pool.

The agreement has encountered risk control issues multiple times in the past year.

This incident has also brought renewed market attention to the risks associated with Summer.fi's multi-chain infrastructure. The protocol currently covers Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. Over the past year, the protocol has experienced withdrawal freezes due to USDX de-pegging and narrowly escaped attack related to rsETH.

In addition, the team had previously intercepted a malicious governance proposal that attempted to influence the protocol by exploiting legacy access permissions. This latest wave of attacks comes at a time when the overall security situation in the DeFi industry remains tense.

According to data cited in the article, by the beginning of the third quarter of 2026, the DeFi sector had suffered losses of more than $840 million due to cyberattacks, with losses exceeding $640 million in April alone.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 122
CoinMeta reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
web3 : SHIB Included in the first batch of supported list on licensed platforms in Japan
SHIB has been included in the list of supported assets for the first batch of newly licensed platforms in Japan, Laser Digital Japan. In the initial stage, the platform will primarily meet the liquidity needs of service institutions.
U.Today
·2026-08-23 19:53:53
18
web3: During the sharp decline in South Korea, Upbit achieved a single-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won
South Korean exchange Upbit saw a one-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won during the flash crash period, with XRP having the highest trading proportion; the entire market cleared approximately 523 million US dollars in one hour.
Cryptonews
·2026-08-23 18:24:12
27
The Sandbox Suspends Cross-Chain Bridge Between Base and BNB Chain: Unsecured SAND Why Can't We Just Look at the Coin Minting Volume?
On August 22, The Sandbox stated that a vulnerability was discovered in its SAND cross-chain bridge on Base and BNB Smart Chain. Attackers were able to mint tokens without the corresponding Ethereum SAND locking support. The team subsequently suspended the related cross-chain functionality and claimed that the vulnerability had been contained. The core issue of this incident is not merely the simple "minting" of additional tokens, but rather the disruption of the most fundamental accounting relationships between cross-chain assets: the mapped tokens on the target chain should correspond one-to-one with the assets locked or destroyed on the source chain; once unsecured minting occurs, the market can no longer assume equivalence between SAND on different chains.
币界网
·2026-08-23 12:29:19
124
Stacks Launches Bitcoin Staking with PoX-5: Self-managed time locks do not equate to a lack of new trust
Stacks has been activated at Bitcoin block height 960230, triggering a PoX-5 hard fork, and preparations are underway to implement the first batch of Bitcoin Staking arrangements. SIP-045 is designed to allow participants to pair their self-managed BTC time locks with STX locks in order to earn BTC rewards. At the same time, the staking process will be adjusted, and miners will receive 1000 STX of rewards per Bitcoin block during the launch phase. This attempt aims to address a long-standing challenge: how to generate on-chain profits for BTC while minimizing the need to entrust assets to centralized custodians.
币界网
·2026-08-23 12:28:56
128
UK retail sales fell by 0.5% in July: Why hasn't this single-month decline erased three months of growth?
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) of the UK announced on August 21 that retail sales in July fell by 0.5% month-on-month, marking the first monthly decline in three months; however, sales were still 1.6% higher than in July 2025. Over the three months to July, there was a 1.1% increase compared to the previous three months, and year-on-year, there was a 3.0% growth. These figures reflect both a short-term weakening and an improvement over a longer period. It is not appropriate to conclude that consumer spending has deteriorated based solely on the -0.5% figure, nor can one claim that household demand has strongly recovered just because of the year-on-year positive growth.
币百科
·2026-08-23 12:28:36
25
View More