ZachXBT accuses projects like LAB of 'highly questionable price action', posts $10,000 bounty for info on alleged market manipulation
The Block
05-08 02:45
Ai Focus
ZachXBT has called out several projects for alleged manipulation, most recently including the AI trading terminal project called LAB.
Helpful
No.Help

Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT has accused Vova Sadkov, the founder of an AI trading terminal project called LAB, of market manipulation and is offering a $10,000 bounty for information related to the alleged scam.

According to ZachXBT and other sleuths, the LAB team allegedly coordinated massive deposits of LAB tokens, worth tens of millions of dollars, to exchanges like Bitget, Bybit, and Binance before a huge price pump in early May.

"$10K bounty is now live on @vsadkovv passport/ID or insider details of the market maker (contracts, chat logs, etc) used for LAB on Bitget spot, Bybit perps Binance perps, or OKX perps," ZachXBT posted to X on Thursday. "These grifters are further hurting the industry reputation and it must not go unpunished. War time mode."

Specter, another onchain analyst, noted that some of these deposits happened weeks in advance, and pointed to gas fees linking wallets allegedly controlled by the LAB team or Sadkov. Some of these wallets were also connected to tokens like SkyAI, which ZachXBT has also alleged shows signs of market manipulation.

ZachXBT posted several times about LAB and Sadkov on Thursday, clarifying that he had DM’d the team earlier with no reply and decided to escalate. He also publicly messaged Gracy Chen, the CEO of Bitget that he accuses of benefiting from the fees driven by manipulated tokens.

"CEXs need to freeze MM profits / distribute to users (victims) when these games happen," ZachXBT said. "Should not rely on people calling it out."

The Block has reached out to Sadkov for comment. It has also contacted Gracy Chen and Bitget.

Indeed, ZachXBT has been calling out more and more relatively small projects for alleged manipulation. Last month, he posted a summary of the RAVE token’s 95% drawdown and pointed to other projects with "highly questionable price action," like SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, and RIVER, he pointed to at the time.

"Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent," he said in April.


Tip
$0
Like
1
Save
1
Views 147
CoinMeta reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
web3: During the sharp decline in South Korea, Upbit achieved a single-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won
South Korean exchange Upbit saw a one-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won during the flash crash period, with XRP having the highest trading proportion; the entire market cleared approximately 523 million US dollars in one hour.
Cryptonews
·2026-08-23 18:24:12
23
web3: Ripple CEO claims the US is close to clarifying crypto regulatory rules
Garlinghouse states that the United States is approaching the formation of a clearer regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, and mentions the relevant judicial statements of XRP as well as the progress of the advisory committee of CFTC.
U.Today
·2026-08-23 17:13:07
26
The Sandbox Suspends Cross-Chain Bridge Between Base and BNB Chain: Unsecured SAND Why Can't We Just Look at the Coin Minting Volume?
On August 22, The Sandbox stated that a vulnerability was discovered in its SAND cross-chain bridge on Base and BNB Smart Chain. Attackers were able to mint tokens without the corresponding Ethereum SAND locking support. The team subsequently suspended the related cross-chain functionality and claimed that the vulnerability had been contained. The core issue of this incident is not merely the simple "minting" of additional tokens, but rather the disruption of the most fundamental accounting relationships between cross-chain assets: the mapped tokens on the target chain should correspond one-to-one with the assets locked or destroyed on the source chain; once unsecured minting occurs, the market can no longer assume equivalence between SAND on different chains.
币界网
·2026-08-23 12:29:19
105
OpenAI Funds 14 Studies on the "Intelligent Era": Why Can't AI Policy Experiments Be Answered Only by Model Companies?
On August 17, OpenAI announced funding for 14 projects led by independent organizations, with themes focusing on economic opportunities and social resilience, continuing the discussions on "industrial policies in the intelligent era" initiated in April of this year. The selected projects cover areas such as labor force, education, local governance, social security, and technology diffusion. Compared to a single product launch, this arrangement is more worth observing from a methodological perspective: when AI affects not only software functionality but also employment structures, skill investments, and public institutions, it becomes difficult to determine who will bear the costs, how the benefits will be distributed, and which policies are effective in different regions, relying solely on internal research within model companies.
CoinMeta
·2026-08-23 12:28:00
24
web3: Metaplanet CEO claims Bitcoin has been influenced by traditional financial systems
Metaplanet CEO expresses opinions on Bitcoin's recent trend, stating that its price has been influenced by the traditional financial system.
U.Today
·2026-08-22 22:40:23
51
View More