Paxos Burns $300 Trillion Worth PYUSD It Mistakenly Minted, Issues Official Statement
摸鱼大佬ks
2025-10-16 16:17

Key Takeaways

  • Paxos mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PayPal USD (PYUSD) during an internal transfer error.
  • The amount was nearly twice the size of global GDP but was burned within 30 minutes.
  • No customer funds were impacted, though DeFi protocols briefly froze PYUSD deposits.

On Oct. 15, stablecoin issuer Paxos triggered one of the most startling errors in crypto’s short history: 300 trillion PYUSD tokens suddenly appeared on Ethereum.

At a 1:1 dollar peg, that’s roughly $300 trillion in stablecoins—an amount greater than twice global GDP.

Within 30 minutes, the anomaly vanished, with Paxos burning the entire supply and restoring balances to normal.

The brief episode, while resolved quickly, rattled DeFi protocols and reignited questions about how tightly controlled stablecoin issuance really is.

How It Happened

The mistake occurred during what Paxos described as a “routine internal transfer.”

On-chain analysis suggests it was likely a fat-finger entry: instead of minting 300 million tokens, an operator keyed in 300 trillion.

The mint briefly inflated PYUSD’s circulating supply, forcing Aave to freeze new deposits of the stablecoin.

Other protocols flagged the sudden spike before Paxos corrected the issue by sending the minted tokens to an irrecoverable Ethereum address.

No Lasting Damage, but Big Lessons

Paxos emphasized that no customer funds were impacted and that the supply quickly returned to its pre-event level of around 253 million tokens.

The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), which regulates Paxos, confirmed it is reviewing the incident.

While the mishap caused no systemic shock, analysts noted how easily a mistake at the issuer level can ripple across the industry.

With PYUSD among the top six stablecoins, even a short-lived minting error was enough to trigger protocol freezes and speculation of deeper issues.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 136
CoinMeta reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
web3: During the sharp decline in South Korea, Upbit achieved a single-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won
South Korean exchange Upbit saw a one-hour trading volume of 11.5 trillion Korean won during the flash crash period, with XRP having the highest trading proportion; the entire market cleared approximately 523 million US dollars in one hour.
Cryptonews
·2026-08-23 18:24:12
27
web3: Ripple CEO claims the US is close to clarifying crypto regulatory rules
Garlinghouse states that the United States is approaching the formation of a clearer regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, and mentions the relevant judicial statements of XRP as well as the progress of the advisory committee of CFTC.
U.Today
·2026-08-23 17:13:07
28
The Sandbox Suspends Cross-Chain Bridge Between Base and BNB Chain: Unsecured SAND Why Can't We Just Look at the Coin Minting Volume?
On August 22, The Sandbox stated that a vulnerability was discovered in its SAND cross-chain bridge on Base and BNB Smart Chain. Attackers were able to mint tokens without the corresponding Ethereum SAND locking support. The team subsequently suspended the related cross-chain functionality and claimed that the vulnerability had been contained. The core issue of this incident is not merely the simple "minting" of additional tokens, but rather the disruption of the most fundamental accounting relationships between cross-chain assets: the mapped tokens on the target chain should correspond one-to-one with the assets locked or destroyed on the source chain; once unsecured minting occurs, the market can no longer assume equivalence between SAND on different chains.
币界网
·2026-08-23 12:29:19
123
OpenAI Funds 14 Studies on the "Intelligent Era": Why Can't AI Policy Experiments Be Answered Only by Model Companies?
On August 17, OpenAI announced funding for 14 projects led by independent organizations, with themes focusing on economic opportunities and social resilience, continuing the discussions on "industrial policies in the intelligent era" initiated in April of this year. The selected projects cover areas such as labor force, education, local governance, social security, and technology diffusion. Compared to a single product launch, this arrangement is more worth observing from a methodological perspective: when AI affects not only software functionality but also employment structures, skill investments, and public institutions, it becomes difficult to determine who will bear the costs, how the benefits will be distributed, and which policies are effective in different regions, relying solely on internal research within model companies.
CoinMeta
·2026-08-23 12:28:00
25
Flipkart Accelerates to Catch Up with India's Top Three Instant Retail Players
On the Minutes of Flipkart, daily orders reached around 1.1 to 1.2 million, approaching the Instamart. Competition in India's instant retail sector continues to heat up.
TechCrunch
·2026-08-23 11:22:37
38
View More