U.S. wholesale inventories rose to $958.9 billion in July: Sales are also growing; inventory pressure cannot be judged solely by the total amount
币百科
1h ago
Ai Focus
The U.S. Census Bureau released wholesale trade data for July on September 10: After adjusting for seasonal and trading day effects, wholesalers' sales amounted to $801.3 billion, a month-on-month increase of 0.8% and a year-on-year increase of 13.0%; inventory at the end of the month was $958.9 billion, a month-on-month increase of 1.3% and a year-on-year increase of 5.7%. Although the growth rate of inventory exceeded that of sales for the month, the inventory-to-sales ratio dropped from 1.28 a year ago to 1.20, indicating that the increase in total inventory did not automatically lead to a general backlog.
Helpful
No.Help

On September 10, the U.S. Census Bureau released data on wholesale trade for July: After adjusting for seasonal and trading day effects, wholesalers' sales amounted to $801.3 billion, a month-on-month increase of 0.8% and a year-on-year increase of 13.0%; inventory at the end of the month was $958.9 billion, a month-on-month increase of 1.3% and a year-on-year increase of 5.7%. Although the growth rate of inventory was faster than sales for that month, the inventory-to-sales ratio dropped from 1.28 a year ago to 1.20, indicating that the increase in total inventory did not automatically lead to a buildup of unsold goods.

The wholesale link is situated between producers and retailers, where inventory can either be a precautionary stockpiling by companies confident about future demand or a passive accumulation resulting from unsold goods. To determine which scenario is more realistic, it is necessary to consider sales, the inventory-to-sales ratio, industry structure, and price changes simultaneously. To assert that companies are holding back goods severely just because they have reached a high of $958.9 billion in inventory would ignore the fact that both nominal prices and sales volumes are also subject to change.

Inventory growth is faster than sales on a month-over-month basis, but the year-over-year comparison reveals another aspect.

In July, sales increased by 0.8% month-on-month, with a statistical error range of plus or minus 0.4 percentage points; inventory also increased by 1.3% month-on-month, with an error range of plus or minus 0.2 percentage points. Both changes indicate clear statistical signals. The sales decline in June was revised from an initial 3.0% to 2.9%. Therefore, July represents both a recovery from the decline in sales from the previous month and a continued increase in inventory, and it cannot be simplified to a single direction.

Year-over-year data can better explain why the inventory-to-sales ratio has decreased. Sales have increased by 13.0% compared to the same period last year, which is significantly faster than inventory growth of 5.7%. As a result, the inventory cost per dollar of monthly sales has dropped from $1.28 to $1.20. This ratio is not an accurate prediction that inventory can last for 1.2 months, as there are significant differences in the industry's turnover rates, but it can help compare the buffer capacity of the wholesale system relative to the scale of sales.

The amounts mentioned in the report do not take into account price changes. When prices for energy, metals, agricultural products, and durable goods rise, nominal sales and inventories will increase even if the physical quantity remains unchanged. The Census Bureau clearly states that the data has been adjusted for seasonal and trading day effects, yet it 'has not been adjusted for price changes.' When analyzing actual demand, it is necessary to consider producer prices, import prices, and experimental estimates of actual wholesale volumes, in order to avoid attributing the amount of inflation-induced expansion solely to an increase in the flow of goods.

Industry differences will further diverge. Industries such as automobiles, machinery, and electronics have long inventory cycles, so companies need to stock up in advance for deliveries; non-durable goods like oil and agricultural products experience large price fluctuations, and changes in nominal amounts may mainly come from quotes. A decrease in the overall ratio does not mean that every sub-industry is healthy; similarly, an increase in overall inventory does not mean that all products are unsalable. What companies are truly concerned about are cancellations of orders for their own products, delivery times, and discounted clearance sales.

The impact on growth and interest rates depends on whether the inventory is actively replenished or passively accumulated.

Changes in inventory are included in the calculation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but the contribution of GDP is measured by the rate of change in inventory investment, rather than the total amount of inventory itself. If inventory continues to increase, and the rate of increase slows down compared to the previous quarter, it may still drag down growth; conversely, even if sales are average, as long as companies shift from reducing inventory to replenishing it, it could potentially boost GDP in the short term. Therefore, one cannot directly infer the quarterly economic contribution from a single-month growth of 1.3%.

Supply chain managers pay attention to the occupation of cash. An increase in inventory means that more working capital is tied up in warehouses, which is particularly evident when financing costs are high. Simultaneous growth in sales can help mitigate this pressure, but if orders cool down in subsequent months, the proactive stockpiling done now could quickly turn into passive overstocking. Enterprises need to monitor accounts receivable, discount rates, and supplier payment terms, rather than just focusing on the quantity of goods on the shelves.

The import rhythm is also an important variable in explaining inventory levels. Companies may experience a sudden increase in inventory for a month due to earlier arrivals caused by freight rates, tariffs, or supply risks; conversely, they might have to stock up in large quantities the following month due to transportation delays. Such temporal mismatches do not necessarily correspond to changes in final demand. Only by considering wholesale data alongside port throughput, import amounts, and manufacturers' delivery times can one determine whether the increase in inventory results from proactive strategic decisions or from logistical factors.

In addition, 1.20 represents the combined ratio of all wholesale industries. Durable goods typically require longer lead times for inventory preparation, while non-durable goods have faster turnover rates. Changes in the weight of each industry can also affect the overall ratio. Analysts looking to assess discount risks should examine specific categories such as automobiles, machinery, pharmaceuticals, clothing, and petroleum, rather than relying on the overall ratio to draw conclusions about any single company.

For monetary policy, wholesale data is not the core indicator that determines interest rates, but it can provide cross-validation of demand and the supply chain. Strong sales may support the assessment of economic resilience, while sufficient inventory may alleviate price pressures on certain goods. When both occur simultaneously, the policy implications are not one-way, and it is necessary to consider data on consumption, production, employment, and inflation as well.

The next monthly report will also revise the current estimates, and any change after a single decimal point should not be presented as an irreversible trend.

The more cautious conclusion drawn from the July report is that wholesale sales recovered after a decline in June, and inventory grew even faster. However, the inventory-to-sales ratio compared to a year ago has decreased. The next set of data may still be revised, and the nominal amounts will be affected by prices. For the market, what is truly worth tracking is not whether $958.9 billion is too high, but whether sales can continue to absorb inventory, whether the differentiation within the industry is widening, and whether companies have begun to use price cuts to improve turnover.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 19
CoinMeta reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
Aave Officially Launched: AI Can Read Positions and Prepare for Transactions, but the Signing Rights Remain in Users' Wallets
Aave Labs launched its official MCP Server on September 8th, with the address being mcp.aave.com. The AI assistant, which supports Model Context Protocol, can read real-time data from Aave V3 and V4 through a single connection. It is also capable of handling transactions such as deposits, loans, repayments, withdrawals, mortgage switching, reward claims, settlements, and exchanges. The most crucial restriction is that the transactions returned by the server remain unsigned, the private key is not held by Aave MCP, and the final authorization still lies with the user's wallet.
币界网
·2026-09-13 09:59:20
19
U.S. corporate applications fell to 531,700 in August: A 7.8% decline from the previous month, but that doesn't mean the startup boom has suddenly ended
The U.S. Census Bureau released statistics on business formation on September 11, showing that in August, after seasonal adjustment, there were 531,728 business applications, which is a decrease of 7.8% compared to the revised figure of 576,512 in July. This decline is quite noticeable, but since it follows a 8.1% month-on-month increase in July, it seems more like a fluctuation at a high level rather than a signal that entrepreneurial activity has entered a recession on its own.
币百科
·2026-09-13 09:56:20
19
Automattic confirms that Mullenweg will return to serve as CEO
Automattic Confirms that Matt Mullenweg will return to serve as CEO. Previously, the board of directors had pushed for his resignation, but subsequently, the company's management made contradictory statements.
TechCrunch
·2026-09-13 07:52:46
37
Altman claims that OpenAI will not go public in 2026
According to Sam Altman, OpenAI will not pursue listing in 2026.
TechCrunch
·2026-09-13 04:33:17
39
View More