SKY (SKY)Price Live Chart, Prediction, Market Cap, Token Unlocks, SKY Concept Stocks CoinMeta

BTC

$76,887.61

-0.01%

/SKY Price

SKY

No.63

$0.06623

-0.12%

≈$0.07

Market Cap

$1.55B

Cir. Cap

$1.52B

Cir. Supply

23.01B

Cir. Rate

98.053%

Total Supply

23.46B

Max Supply

23.46B

24h Volume

$236.62M

24h Vol (BTC)

15.63M

24h Turnover

1.025967%

Market Share

0.06%

Performance

Low

0.06

Range

+0.07%

High

0.07

Listing

ATH (2025-02-03)

$0.1014

-34.71%

ATL (2024-12-03)

$0.0343

+93.1%

Official

Contract

Ethereum: 0x5607...Ed9279

Official

Social

Network

Converter

OKX Exchange

A leading cryptocurrency trading platform. Sign up to get a 50 USDT crypto mystery box!

Binance Exchange

Binance is a world-leading cryptocurrency exchange platform. Easily buy crypto on your phone.

Chart

Market

Huobi Invite: Earn points & commission

Price

Cap

K-line

Depth

1 Minute

5 Minutes

15 Minutes

1 Hour

4 Hours

1 Day

TradingView

+1.46%

24H

-0.12%

+27.02%

30D

+12.39%

-7.3%

All

AI Assistant

SKY下跌原因

SKY资金流向

SKY买卖支撑位

SKY多空比分析

SKY趋势分析

Ask AI

SKY Market

CEX Spot

CEX Derivatives

Pairs Funds

#	Exchange	Pairs	Price	+2%Depth	-2%Depth	Volume (24h)
1	Bitfinex	SKYUSDT	0.065972	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	183
2	OKX	SKYUSDC	0.06592	$104,576.99	$94,182.01	9,226
3	CoinEx	SKYUSDT	0.066214	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	14,116
4	MEXC Global	SKYUSDC	0.06611	$104,576.99	$94,182.01	55,325
5	MEXC Global	SKYUSDT	0.06608	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	61,166
6	Bitunix	SKYUSDT	0.06612	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	74,408
7	gate.io	SKYUSDT	0.06615	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	81,868
8	Binance	SKYUSDC	0.0661	$104,576.99	$94,182.01	85,096
9	BingX	SKYUSDT	0.0661	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	95,660
10	Hotbit	SKYUSDT	0.065634	$134,780.60	$132,097.02	150,933

17 items

Rows

#	Unlock Date	Unlock Amount	Unlock Value	Total Supply %	Unlock Details
No Data

70%

30%

Bullish

Bearish

Community

Fu Lu Shou UV DAO

08-02 12:44

Is the Middle East situation about to escalate? The U.S. State Department issued a broad security warning to American citizens in the Middle East, advising them to consider leaving the region or prepare for a swift evacuation should the situation escalate. Washington is considering a new military strike against Iran as early as this weekend. Iran has also stated it will further strike countries that allow U.S. military bases. Israeli officials stated that current tensions have reached a breaking point and are on the verge of exploding. U.S. President Trump: We are closer than ever to launching a major strike against Iran. Iran's Foreign Ministry: We are determined to continue on the path of resistance and defense. Forget the talk, the sky suddenly darkens and it looks like it's going to rain; it's time to bring in the blankets.

410

Frank Chaparro

08-02 01:14

Grayscale: Valuation gaps among DeFi lending platforms remain significant. • Price/Total Revenue: Aave's P/E ratio is only 1.0, while Morpho's is 6.6, Compound's is 4.3, and Sky's is 3.2. • Price/Net Revenue: Aave's is 7.6, while Compound's is a whopping 71.8. Based on these valuation metrics, Aave remains the lowest-valued among mainstream DeFi lending protocols. Data Source: Grayscale, DeFi Llama.

367

Mario Nawfal

07-30 12:19

🇷🇺🇺🇦 All the latest reports focus on the war itself, rather than on how Russians truly feel about it. Zelensky just told Sky News that Ukrainian intelligence indicates Russia is preparing for a new round of mobilization, potentially reaching 300,000 to 500,000 troops after the September elections. The objective is clear: more troops are needed to keep pace with casualties as the current recruitment rate cannot keep up. Meanwhile, Ukrainian drones have again achieved precision strikes in occupied Crimea. They destroyed an S-400 air defense missile system and its critical 96L6 radar, located north of the Crimean Bridge. This system is one of Russia's main long-range air defense weapons. Destroying the radar helps deactivate the missile site and creates space for deeper strikes against the logistics and infrastructure maintaining the occupation. This is the current pattern. Russia appears prepared to deploy hundreds of thousands more undertrained and poorly equipped troops into this chaotic conflict. Ukraine continues to weaken Crimea and its land bridges' air defense systems and supply lines. Troop strength and equipment on the battlefield continue to escalate. According to recent polls, Putin's approval rating remains around 70%, and the majority still generally support the war. However, public support for the endless fighting is waning, with a growing number of Russians expressing a preference for peace talks. However, this domestic sentiment is negligible compared to the daily updates on troop reinforcements and new airstrikes. Source: Sky News, Kagan Dunlap YT / Author: Lucas

437

Stop

07-29 01:38

Aave's savings GHO (sGHO) currently offers a higher yield than sUSDS and all of Spark's savings products. Last week, Sky lowered its savings rate (sUSDS) from 3.60% to 3.52%. This rate, which was as high as 4% in February, is currently at 3.52% after several reductions. Spark's savings products have also been lowering their rates over the past few months. Current Rates: → sGHO: 4.25% → sUSDS (Sky): 3.52% → Spark Savings (USDC/USDT/USDS/PYUSD): 2.75% to 3.52% sGHO currently offers 73 basis points more than sUSDS. GHO is Aave's native stablecoin, over-collateralized by assets held within the protocol. Savings GHO can be redeemed for GHO at any time, with no minimum deposit required. It automatically provides savings interest paid in GHO, funded from two sources: - Interest paid by GHO borrowers, and - Returns earned from the stablecoin reserves backing GHO.

428

Token Terminal 📊

07-28 04:06

Over 55% of the market capitalization of stablecoins resides on the Ethereum mainnet. If L2 stablecoins are included, this figure approaches 60%. Issuers choose Ethereum for the same reasons: security, reliability, ample liquidity, and a DeFi ecosystem that allows stablecoins to be effective immediately upon launch. Circle, Tether, Sky, and Ethena are all built on and scaled on Ethereum. In the past year, Fidelity, PayPal, and Société Générale have adopted similar strategies, while JPMorgan Chase's JPMD uses Base for settlement. Ethereum remains the default settlement platform for institutional digital asset strategies and the optimal venue for conducting business.

430

07-28 02:34

America, here we come! 🇺🇸 LCX US Exchange. Built for you from the start. The waiting list is now live. On the same day: Coinbase launches the $LCX token 2.0 upgrade. A new era begins today 🧵 LCX US Exchange. Built for US users from the start. The essence of LCX, plus all the experience we've gained operating an exchange since 2020: easy registration process. Cold storage. Truly valuable assets. State-by-state rollout. Now, let's talk about this upgrade. Coinbase has historically only offered token migration services for a very limited number of projects. Polygon (MATIC → POL). Maker (MKR → SKY). $LCX is also among these projects. Automatic, 1:1 migration, zero fees, no operation required. And this isn't new. $LCX has been listed on Coinbase since 2021, years earlier than any other exchange token. For five years, we have been supported by the largest exchange in the US. Europe taught us rigorous discipline. Our exchange has grown under the strictest regulatory standards globally. Security, custody, compliance: integrated from the beginning, not added later. This is just the beginning. Assets. Products. Coverage states. As the launch date approaches, everything will be revealed. Waiting list members will be informed first. Financial freedom is coming to the US. 🇺🇸 Join for free. Only an email address is needed. You will receive priority service once your state launches. Join: This post is from LCX USA. LCX's only official accounts are @LCX on X and our Telegram account, and our only official domains include our subdomains. Please do not click on any links in replies or messages below this post. Full disclaimer is below.

479

Mario Nawfal

07-26 16:35

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump canceled plans for a large-scale strike against Iran over the weekend. We will analyze the calculations for missile deployment, which may explain the reason… For the second consecutive night, midnight came and went, but no bombers were seen in the sky. Subsequently, The New York Times published a new report: Trump has now shelved plans for a significant escalation of the conflict. Government officials cited the dwindling stockpile of interceptor missiles as the primary reason, followed by the increased risk of war, strikes against Gulf allies, and the resulting economic and refugee crisis. Almost no one in his inner circle supports escalating the conflict; they doubt that more bombs will have any impact on Tehran other than making it more united. Larry Johnson, who worked for the CIA and State Department for thirty years, also believes the answer lies in the mechanisms. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff privately warned that resuming large-scale combat is feasible, but it would severely deplete the interceptor missiles protecting all US military bases in the region. The department responsible for developing such air combat plans was at a standstill this weekend; its planners didn't get started because any actual strike orders wouldn't allow them to. The key lies in the following inventory figures. Officials claim the interceptor inventory is close to one thousand. Larry's estimate is: "Probably less than two hundred." There's a reasonable reservation here, as approximately 90 US refueling aircraft are reportedly stationed at Israeli airfields, and the inventory could also serve as a buffer. The war ends either because of a collapse in morale or because of running out of ammunition. Washington is witnessing firsthand which will happen first. @NewSonof

391

Mario Nawfal

07-24 08:21

🚨🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran has rejected the only ceasefire proposal on the table, stating that if Trump attacks Tehran, Iran will attack Tel Aviv. According to The New York Times, the Iraqi prime minister brought the ceasefire proposal to Tehran after Trump's visit to the White House, meeting with Pezeshkian, Ghalibaf, and Araghchi, but Iran rejected it. Iranian officials stated that this was the only viable solution and that they would not accept any interim agreement that failed to resolve the issue of control of the Strait of Hormuz. Araghchi dismissed the mediation itself: "The problem is not in conveying a message, but in the American mindset, which is illogical, greedy, and controlling." Two Iranian officials stated that if Trump attacks Tehran and its critical infrastructure, the Iranian military is preparing for an escalation of the war, and Iran will respond by attacking Tel Aviv and demanding that the Houthi rebels completely block the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. In Azadi Square, pro-war rallies are held every night, and a military vehicle was reportedly seen displaying ballistic missiles pointed into the sky. Every highway exit ramp built this month now leads to the same wall: Iran will not… Trump will not concede on any agreement that leaves the situation in the Strait of Hormuz hanging in the balance. What remains is the threat of expanding the war from the Gulf to the Mediterranean, and a president considering an attack on a scale larger than any he has ordered so far. Source: The New York Times / Author: Daniel

300

Leek Brothers 👬² 🧪

07-23 05:40

🚨Elon Musk is not just an entrepreneur. He is building "civilization-level" infrastructure for all of humanity. SpaceX is sending us to Mars, and Neuralink has enabled paralyzed people to type with their thoughts. This is not a PowerPoint presentation; it's rockets soaring into the sky and real videos. Do you think the future should be steered by one person or written by seven billion people?

368

SOL I don't understand

07-21 20:55

A Look Back at the 2000 Dot-com Bubble: Four Key Signals, Which Are AI Replaying? Everyone is asking if AI is a bubble, but they're asking the wrong question. The real question should be: If it is a bubble, in what form will it burst? The biggest similarity between the 2000 dot-com bubble and today's AI boom isn't technology, but human nature. The biggest difference isn't technology either, but the source of funding. Understanding this will prevent you from getting hung up on whether Nvidia's next quarterly earnings will be good or bad, or focusing on news about Meta leasing computing power. Those are just appearances. The underlying financing structure and the power struggles behind those appearances are the core factors determining whether and how a bubble will burst. 01) The Bubble Isn't Technology, It's the Financing Structure Many people, when reviewing 2000, only say that internet companies had no revenue and high valuations. This is mistaking the result for the cause. The 2000 bubble was so devastating because the entire internet industry was held hostage by the stock market's financing capabilities. Companies with no revenue rely on IPOs for funding, venture capitalists rely on IPO exits, listed companies rely on refinancing and acquisitions for expansion, and telecommunications equipment manufacturers survive on purchase orders from these revenue-less companies. The expansion of upstream fiber optics, optical modules, and routers wasn't driven by genuine demand, but by the unlimited ammunition downstream companies burning through cash to buy into the future. The stock market was the true engine of this bubble. Once stock market financing stopped, the entire industry ecosystem instantly suffered a blood shortage. Therefore, the collapse of 2000 wasn't a simple bubble burst; it was the engine stalling. Today's AI market is different. Currently, those burning cash are well-funded giants like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta. They don't rely on stock market financing; they rely on corporate bonds, operating cash flow, and balance sheets. The fuel for AI infrastructure isn't IPOs, but Capex. This means two things: First, if the AI bubble bursts, it won't manifest as an IPO freeze or a mass extinction of startups; second, it's more likely to manifest as a slow contraction from the corporate side due to "lower-than-expected returns on capital expenditures." This contraction won't be dramatic, but it will be very gradual. It's like a high-speed train slowly easing off the accelerator, rather than slamming on the brakes. 02) The bursting of a bubble isn't caused by bad news, but by a collapse of the narrative. The bubble of 2000 wasn't burst by a single piece of negative news. What truly killed it was a series of "not-good enough" news. When the market reaches that level, what it needs isn't good news, but increasingly better good news. Any neutral, any "normalization" statement will be interpreted as bad news. Because expectations have been set sky-high, only exceeding expectations can sustain them, but in reality, there's no such thing as perpetually exceeding expectations. This is the cruelty of a bubble: it doesn't need real negative news, it only needs insufficient positive news. So you see, when Cisco CEO Chambers said "normalizing," he meant the company was entering a period of normal growth, but the market heard it as "there's enough network equipment." If today, if Jensen Huang said in an earnings call, "GPU supply and demand are now approaching equilibrium," how do you think the market would react? There are only two states in a supply chain: shortage and surplus. There is no "just right." "Equilibrium" at the peak of a bubble is the prelude to surplus. 03) Four Moments of Faith Collapse If I had to summarize the year 2000 as a series of signals, I would use four words: Enough, No More Buying, Slower, Idle. Enough. Companies started saying bandwidth was sufficient, and enough fiber optic cables had been laid. This wasn't bad news, but it disrupted the narrative of "perpetual scarcity." This round corresponds to the narrative of "computing power is no longer scarce"—Meta's rental of computing power, shorter GPU delivery cycles, and increased reuse rates by cloud providers are all essentially variations of "enough." When the belief in "scarcity" is shaken, the valuation foundation of the entire industry chain loosens. Because all the stories of the past two years were built on the assumption that "computing power will never be enough." Once this assumption starts to crack, capital will reassess every link. No More Buying. Telecom operators began cutting capital expenditures. They were the largest buyers back then, equivalent to today's hyperscale cloud providers. Their slowdown in procurement indicates that buyers' ammunition is running low. Today, if Microsoft, Google, and Amazon were to slow down data center construction or reduce their capital expenditure growth rate from 50% to 20%, the market would immediately panic. More alarming is the fact that the financial fraud by these operators in 2000 was essentially because they couldn't support real demand and had to use accounting tricks to embellish the picture. In this round of AI infrastructure development, short sellers are already telling a similar story: Hyperscale cloud vendors include unproduced GPUs and data centers under construction in their CIP (Computer-to-Inventory) figures, without depreciation; There's an 18-month gap between GPU procurement and power-on operation, completely omitting technological depreciation and hardware aging; expenditures are capitalized, suppressing current expenses. These factors contribute to abnormal earnings growth in the S&P 500, typical financial characteristics of a bubble period. It's slowing down. The order growth of leading companies is slowing. Cisco's performance was still growing back then, but when the growth rate slowed, the market's PE ratio plummeted from 120 to 15. If Nvidia and Micron also experience "good growth, but below expectations" today, the same valuation correction will repeat itself. During a bubble, the second derivative is a hundred times more important than the first derivative. This is the most brutal aspect of valuation during a bubble. A company's performance may still be growing rapidly, but the capital market's pricing has already shifted from "high-speed growth" to "slowing growth." Once the second derivative turns negative, the speed at which valuations are destroyed will far exceed the speed at which performance changes. Idle capacity. A landmark overcapacity has been discovered. In 2000, it was dark fiber—a large amount of laid fiber optic cables went unused. Today, if someone were to definitively prove that data center GPUs or HBMs have a large amount of idle capacity, or that the computing power utilization for training models is extremely low, that would be a fourth type of signal. This isn't a matter of expectation; it's a matter of fact. Dark Fiber became a landmark event because it completely disproved the narrative of "long-term shortage." If in the future we see terms like "Dark GPU" or "Dark HBM,"...The main upward wave of this round of AI market rally has most likely ended. These four signals progress in layers: from narrative wavering to buyer contraction, then to order slowdown, and finally, the confirmation of overcapacity. The further along the path, the less it's speculation and the more concrete the evidence. In 2000, it took about six months to a year to go from the first to the fourth signal. If this round of AI follows a similar path, the timeframe might be similar. 04) Why is this one more insidious? The bubble of 2000 was very transparent. No revenue, high valuations, and a frenzy of IPOs—even ordinary retail investors could see these signals. When it finally burst, it was a cataclysmic event, with the Nasdaq plummeting by 80%. If this round of AI bubble materializes, it will be much more insidious because the players have changed. Back then, the main players were startups without revenue and retail investors who chased the highs and sold the lows. Today, it's cash-rich tech giants, professional institutions, and global sovereign wealth funds. They won't sell off in a day; instead, they will reassess the return on capital expenditures and adjust their budgets gradually. This leads to a bizarre phenomenon: the AI industry may continue its rapid growth, but related stocks may stagnate or even decline for an extended period. This is because market expectations have been inflated too much; even rapid actual growth cannot keep up with the hype. This state of "industry boom, stagnant stock prices" is the most agonizing. It's also the most insidious way a bubble bursts—not a complete collapse, but a slow deflation. Many people will keep trying to buy the dip in this state, only to get trapped more and more, because their underlying logic is correct—AI is indeed developing, but the stock price bubble hasn't completely burst. 05) Survival Strategies for Ordinary People If you're not a sell-side analyst, not an industry insider, and don't have the ability to track GPU inventory, HBM capacity, cloud vendor CIPs, and capital expenditure plans in real time, then don't try to be a smart player in this game. Judging a bubble is extremely difficult. Even if you guess the direction correctly, it's extremely difficult to guess the timing and magnitude. Many people were bearish on the internet in 2000, but many were too early and were squeezed out of business. The market can remain irrational for a long time, long enough to make you question your existence. The only thing ordinary people can do is admit they can't see clearly, and then use a sufficiently long time window to blur the lines to the correctness. This tool is the index. Buy the Nasdaq 100, buy the S&P 500. You're not betting on whether a particular company will become the next Cisco; you're betting on the long-term upward trend of the technological revolution. Even if the bubble bursts, the index will be rejuvenated: bad companies are eliminated, and new companies take their place. After the 2000 bubble, the Nasdaq 100 rose more than tenfold from its bottom. Moreover, compared to individual stocks, indices have a huge psychological advantage: you don't need to judge whether the bubble has burst. Because regardless of whether it bursts or not, your strategy is to hold. This will reduce your chances of making 80% fewer mistakes. The temptation to guess the top and bottom is great, but history has repeatedly proven that those who hold indices long-term outperform the vast majority of those trying to be clever. History doesn't simply repeat itself, but human nature does. Last time, people died from greed and fear; this time will be the same. The difference is that clever people try to predict bubbles, while the real winners simply buy the entire market.

480