According to CoinMeta, as reported by Coinspectator, users' mnemonics can remain secure even if the permissions for old wallets are still active. While most wallet security checks focus on the storage location of mnemonics, a thorough backup does not reveal who or what can still move funds. An effective permission audit should determine which tokens still have unlimited authorization, which WalletConnect sessions are active, which exchange API keys can be used for trading or withdrawals, which smart accounts still have delegated tasks, which multi-signer setups are still valid, and which old devices can approve transactions. Permissions can age silently, and the protocols you trust may have changed their contracts, ownership, or maintenance status over time. Nothing needs to happen today, but forgotten authorizations could become a vulnerability tomorrow. Wallets should provide a revocation screen that sorts potential losses. Unlimited authorizations with no active deposits are more concerning than contract addresses and creation dates. Once or twice a year, I would rather spend twenty minutes revoking old access permissions and reauthorizing the few applications I am still using, rather than assuming inactivity means safety.